Buyers lean in, ask good questions, tell you it’s impressive — and then go quiet.
You’re generating interest. You’re not generating urgency. Those feel identical on a call and they are not the same thing, and every month you spend fixing the wrong one is a month of runway you don’t get back.
That work became the basis for the HBR article “Startup Founders Need a New Sales Playbook” →
Every one of these has a different root cause. Fixing the wrong one costs you a quarter.
Four dedicated hours of your time — the five days are the calendar, not the workload.
Are you talking to the wrong people? Is the motion actually working, or has winging it just stopped scaling? Four sessions of questions most advisors won’t ask — because they’re working from a playbook that closed deals in 2021, when money was free and buyers said yes to pilots. Mine comes from 250+ founders this year, in the market you’re selling into now.
A real deliverable, anonymized. Read the whole thing before you decide.
After five days with Dave, nexwise reframed the problem, sharpened the ICP, and left with a clearer way to tell which deals were real. From "fix for broken shops" to a board-level constraint.
Already know the motion works and the hire is the next move? I place Founding AEs too →
Most GTM advice is a fossil — a playbook that worked when the advisor was last carrying a number. Mine is 250+ conversations with founders across 40+ countries since May 2025: what is closing, what is stalling, and what stopped working the moment money stopped being free. I've run the motion too — founding AE at gen.video (zero to $10M ARR), six years in sales leadership at Salesforce, $1M to $25M at Outreach. That's why I can read a motion. The 250+ is why the read is current.
That was one founder’s last quarter before we found the constraint — twenty-one conversations that went nowhere, and no idea which of them were real. Five days to name what’s actually breaking — four dedicated hours of your time — before you spend another quarter fixing the wrong thing.