Buyers lean in, ask good questions, tell you it’s impressive — and then go quiet.
You’re generating interest. You’re not generating urgency. Those feel identical on a call and they are not the same thing, and every month you spend fixing the wrong one is a month of runway you don’t get back.
The first 250+ became the basis for the HBR article “Startup Founders Need a New Sales Playbook” →
Every one of these has a different root cause. Fixing the wrong one costs you a quarter.
Four dedicated hours of your time — the five days are the calendar, not the workload.
Is the motion actually working, or has winging it just stopped scaling? Four sessions of questions most advisors won’t ask — because they’re working from a playbook that closed deals in 2021, when money was free and buyers said yes to pilots. Mine comes from 300+ founders this year, in the market you’re selling into now.
A real deliverable, anonymized — the bottleneck, the trigger, the buyer, the exact call flow.
After five days with Dave, nexwise reframed the problem, sharpened the ICP, and left with a clearer way to tell which deals were real. From "fix for broken shops" to a board-level constraint.
Already know the motion works and the hire is the next move? I place Founding AEs too →
Most GTM advice is a fossil — a playbook that worked when the advisor was last carrying a number. Mine is 300+ conversations with founders across 40+ countries since May 2025: what is closing, what is stalling, and what stopped working the moment money stopped being free. I've run the motion too — founding AE at gen.video (zero to $10M ARR), six years in sales leadership at Salesforce, $1M to $25M at Outreach. That's why I can read a motion. The 300+ is why the read is current.
That was one founder’s last quarter before we found the constraint — twenty-one conversations that went nowhere, and no idea which of them were real. Five days to name what’s actually breaking — four dedicated hours of your time — before you spend another quarter fixing the wrong thing.